Like the way that missions are rated for excellence by the # of stars they receive, could NSFW missions be rated by the # of red flags?

A mission that may be rated NSFW for profanity probably is not considered as 'dirty' (by most people) as a site rated NSFW for a diarrhea fountain (or whatever it was, sweet potato soda?)

I realize that I'm bringing up the slippery slope again--just what is considered dirty? By introducing the flag rating system, it would be subject to a vote by those who have taken the mission knowing that it was NSFW in the first place. And as someone mentioned in a mission pop-up, 'Go ahead! Indulge your inner syphilitc dwarf!'
And I am all for that, I am all for the free speech aspect of picking sites for missions...
I would just like to get a clue as to HOW much I'm asking for...
A dirty joke? Or nausea and a complete aversion to Thanksgiving side-dishes? ;)

I don't want to sound angry (Since I'm not,) or like I'm advocating censorship---just a more accurate warning system.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fre...

by pixielo 4 months ago
| Permalink

Sure, any warning system at this point is a good thing. Those missions that are NSFW don't seem to have ANY notification, except for a mention in the mission blurb. I would like to see a big red flag, or a stripe--or something else to get my attention.

The wording in the introductions is not always enough to get an accurate idea of where you are going on a mission, and as much as I like that idea--that there is 'mystery' involved--I do not want my browser hijacked by Rick Astley or turned into a coprophiliac's delight.

by pixielo 4 months ago
| Permalink

Oh nevermind, you can flag a mission after you do it, and there's a NSFW toggle in profile settings.

I will now return to my squishy soft newb shoatness.

by kageseraph 4 months ago
| Permalink