The Passively Multiplayer Online Game

PMOG Forum

civilized discourse for an uncivilized gameworld

Forums » Misadventures (Bug Reports) » Feature Request: No pings for idiots.

(advertisements appear if you're not logged in or need to create an account)

« Previous 1 2 Next »

Author	Thread
davidsev Level 20 Destroyer Posts: 403	Pings are earned for social interaction right? So people who don't understand the basics of civilised society shouldn't get as many. Multiply the amount you get by your rating on your profile. Also IMO you should have to be level 10(?) and have been here a few weeks in order to be able to rate someone. Otherwise alts etc can get a high rating. by davidsev about 1 month ago \| Permalink
riscy Level 17 Destroyer Posts: 1059	Agreed, and I think that there is also the danger of people spamming the forums with drivel (unlike me :) ), as well as consecutive posts. On several forums I know that is frowned upon, you should rather edit the previous post, and also no one word posts allowed, unless it is a game eg word association. by riscy about 1 month ago \| Permalink
nieman Level 20 Destroyer Posts: 1212	DIS-a-fucking-greed. And also, as much as I throw "tard" out there in small groups and the like... don't you think it's pretty fucking crass to put it in the unavoidable-to-see forum topic in such a context? Also, using ratings is a lame idea, many of us joke about our 'rating' and strive for a one-star. Destroyers automatically have a super-low rating not because of anything other than actually playing the game and using tools. Actually... did you even bother to think this idea out? by nieman about 1 month ago \| Permalink
sylverling Steward Level 20 Pathmaker Posts: 1598	Gotta agree with nieman. All it takes is one disagreement for someone to rate another player low, and get all their friends to rate that player low too, when it might not even be such a big deal, just a mining or two...(has never EVER had this happen...of course...). If there are spammers or people who are being dumbasses, well, there are ways to deal with them. by sylverling about 1 month ago \| Permalink
riscy Level 17 Destroyer Posts: 1059	Agree with nieman for once, stop the press!! I also thought the title was a bit harsh, and considered mentioning the use of the word retard, but decided not to. by riscy about 1 month ago \| Permalink
uselessness Level 18 Benefactor Posts: 765	Nieman made a swear! Every swear should cost TWO HUNDRED DP. It is decreed. Actually, nah, I don't care. by uselessness about 1 month ago \| Permalink
sylverling Steward Level 20 Pathmaker Posts: 1598	Seems to me like you're pre-emptively trying to solve a problem that isn't a problem. Why not wait and see if it becomes a problem before we worry about it? by sylverling about 1 month ago \| Permalink
togmar Level 20 Destroyer Posts: 288	This sounds like one of those "only people who take the game seriously should be allowed to play" kind of attitudes. Is this part of the election manifesto? by togmar about 1 month ago \| Permalink
karmakaze Level 20 Pathmaker Posts: 288	Dude, much as I hate being the voice of political correctness "retard" is an ableist slur and I'd kind of appreciate if folks could try to think of another way of phrasing this sort of thing. by karmakaze about 1 month ago \| Permalink
uselessness Level 18 Benefactor Posts: 765	Dude, much as I hate being the voice of reasonable English "ableist" is a contrived abomination and I'd kind of appreciate if folks could try to think of a reasonable word to describe discrimination against handicapped people. Seriously. I cringed so hard I think I threw my back out. by uselessness about 1 month ago \| Permalink
davidsev Level 20 Destroyer Posts: 403	I have never really heard the term retard used to refer to disabled people, just idiots. The word retard has been used in physics etc for a very long time, and from a quick google its definition is still deceleration / to slow down, and the colloquial someone who's a bit thick. The only times I have ever heard it applied to the mentally ill is as a generic insult or in its technical meaning, but I don't see idiot or slow being labeled as "ableist(sic)". I would edit the title to shut people up, but apparently I cant. Yes, the idea wasn't well thought out, but who cares. I still stand behind the original concept that people shouldn't be able to earn pings by annoying people. My suggested solution may suck, but that's what discussion is for. And no, this has nothing to do with the election, or anything else. I'm of the opinion that griefers shouldn't be rewarded. That's my opinion. Bunni3 gets to set the party opinion on things, I do what she says or quit. And its also nothing to do with "taking the game seriously". Its don't deliberately ruin forum games etc. Or if you want to be an arsehole, don't get rewarded for it. And as for solving a problem that isn't a problem, maybe I am just pessimistic. But I've been around the net long enough to know that there are a lot of idiots and it only takes a few to destroy a lot. I'm sorry if I offended anyone, that wasn't my intention. by davidsev about 1 month ago \| Permalink
riscy Level 17 Destroyer Posts: 1059	Good post, David, and I am glad you were willing to edit the title (if unable to do so) - I particularly agree with your statement "there are a lot of idiots and it only takes a few to destroy a lot." At the minute PMOG is for the most part a great community of supportive players, and I hope that it will continue to grow as it has done over the last months. by riscy about 1 month ago \| Permalink
sylverling Steward Level 20 Pathmaker Posts: 1598	I just don't see it as a problem yet is all. Nobody's been really annoying about it. I don't see the point in adding a restriction against people who are doing nothing wrong so far (under level 10s, or whatever it was you had in mind). And people ABOVE level 10 can be just as annoying, frankly. I recognize your concern but I don't think it's an issue yet. Let's not make it one till it needs to be. by sylverling about 1 month ago \| Permalink
sylverling Steward Level 20 Pathmaker Posts: 1598	Davidsev: Down at the bottom of the thread there should be a link for "Edit topic." Do you not have that? We stewards can't do it for you. But since it's your thread, you should have it... and if you don't, can you file a bug report? http://pmog.com/about/contact by sylverling about 1 month ago \| Permalink
davidsev Level 20 Destroyer Posts: 403	Awesome thanks, I never noticed that. I assumed it would be part of editing the first post like most places. And stewards should totally be able to edit peoples posts etc. by davidsev about 1 month ago \| Permalink
squidbait Level 16 Pathmaker Posts: 371	Personally I would like to see the "rating" dropped from the profile. As has been pointed out it is essentially meaningless by squidbait about 1 month ago \| Permalink
bunni3burn Level 20 Destroyer Posts: 1370	Wow Davidsev way to put a whip in my hand! makes whip noise Anyways just in case. As second input this has nothing to do with the elections. In fact I disagree with Davidsev's opinion about pings and ratings. Which is a first. No more of that Davidsev! lol. :D by bunni3burn about 1 month ago \| Permalink
shyiskhar Steward Level 19 Destroyer Posts: 2112	I don't know about doing this by rating... But the idea is sound. I think I saw in the pings thread that you had to be a certain level to be able to use the pings, So that would cut back on a lot of the non players just using it to be annoying. They should so introduce a Harry Potter style house point system. Everyone is filed in a certain association when they register, (This would have no effect other than being a default or house association) and then as you play trustee's and stewards can give you points for helping, and deduct points for being an ass. Then at the end of the year the association with the most points gets a bonus to there tools for the next year. (Destroyers do 15dp damage, Nicks last for 2 mines, Armor lasts through 4 mines... Crates hold 20 items, Portals last 60 jumps and missions earn you more dp per times taken) It's be an awesome way of increasing loyalty to our default associations... by shyiskhar about 1 month ago \| Permalink
davidsev Level 20 Destroyer Posts: 403	I like that idea, although it would need a better way of assigning people, an avid destroyer who gets put in the Bedouin camp won't be very happy. by davidsev about 1 month ago \| Permalink
mmmpi Level 20 Pathmaker Posts: 554	I just like to say PING! by mmmpi about 1 month ago \| Permalink
bunni3burn Level 20 Destroyer Posts: 1370	Overall I like the idea. I don't like the idea of having trustees and stewards give points. They seem like they are too busy for that kind of thing. I think the earning of Pings should remain like they are now. Well not exactly since I don't get why looting a crate gives me more than stashing a crate. But I like how they are dealed out now, rather than trustess and stewards doing it. by bunni3burn about 1 month ago \| Permalink
pixielo Level 20 Pathmaker Posts: 3706	There's no way that I would want to be the one handing out pings or points to anyone! Anyone at all! by pixielo about 1 month ago \| Permalink
salmontickler Steward Level 20 Destroyer Posts: 1428	Heh, gotta love how the topic changes but the thread url doesnt. I will have to consider my election vote more carefully now david has been flushed out as a tard hater. by salmontickler about 1 month ago \| Permalink
chetyre Steward Level 20 Pathmaker Posts: 1265	And stewards should totally be able to edit peoples posts etc. Seconded! by chetyre about 1 month ago \| Permalink
sylverling Steward Level 20 Pathmaker Posts: 1598	yeah, i don't wanna be in charge of handing out pings. by sylverling about 1 month ago \| Permalink